Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311386›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2024

Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis.

Paula Valentina Estrada Alarcón, Patricia Moya Alvarado, Elena Leonor Sirvent Alierta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula Valentina Estrada AlarcónDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Sant Joan Despi Moises Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia Moya AlvaradoDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Elena Leonor Sirvent AliertaDepartment of Rheumatology, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent large vessel primary vasculitis in the elderly. Correct diagnosis and fast assessment are necessary to prevent complications as well as unnecessary treatments. Giant cell arteritis can present as classical cranial symptoms or as extracranial disease. Although temporal artery biopsy is still the gold standard, ultrasound (US) is gaining ground on evidence with good diagnostic performance as a first approach to support the clinical criteria. The "halo" sign is the most characteristic finding and should be a requisite for reporting an US assessment for GCA with a 43%- 77% sensitivity and 89%-100% specificity, when compared to American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. Ultrasound is a cost-effective, noninvasive test that offers bed-side results. The need for an experienced sonographer and consensus on the methodology and interpretation of US is fundamental to reduce operator-dependent errors. The diagnostic US algorithm for GCA depends on the clinical scenarios, and in some cases it may be enough to confirm or discard the GCA diagnosis. We review procedure details for cranial and extracranial arteries and technical requirements.

Identifiers

PMID39311386
PMCPMC11459609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.