Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311255›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2024

The Impact of Perception-Action Training Devices on Quickness and Reaction Time in Female Volleyball Players.

Nicola Mancini, Marilena Di Padova, Rita Polito, Siria Mancini, Anna Dipace, Angelo Basta, Dario Colella, Pierpaolo Limone, Giovanni Messina, Marcellino Monda and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nicola ManciniDepartment of Wellbeing, Nutrition and Sport, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-4566-6417
Marilena Di PadovaDepartment of Humanistic Studies, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-7095
Rita PolitoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Siria ManciniDepartment of Humanistic Studies, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-5584-6409
Anna DipaceDepartment of Psychology and Education, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Angelo BastaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-3954-997X
Dario ColellaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Pierpaolo LimoneDepartment of Psychology and Education, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-4005
Giovanni MessinaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology and Unit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Marcellino MondaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology and Unit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7184-218X
Antonietta MondaDepartment of Human Science and Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele Telematic University, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Mariasole Antonietta GuerrieroDepartment of Humanistic Studies, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Antonietta MessinaDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Fiorenzo MoscatelliDepartment of Wellbeing, Nutrition and Sport, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-0332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a training program utilizing action perception technology (PAD) tools on improving the motor reaction times and neuromuscular capabilities of the upper and lower limbs compared to a traditional training program. Twenty-four female volleyball players competing in the Italian national championship were randomized into two groups of 12 athletes each: an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG). A preliminary analysis confirmed the absence of significant differences in age and anthropometric characteristics between the groups. All the players underwent an initial battery of tests (pre-test), including Reaction Time simple Upper and Lower Limb (RTsUL and RTsLL) and Tapping Upper and Lower Limb (TUL and TLL). During a 6-week training program, the experimental group used exercises with a technological system of illuminated disks, while the control group followed the traditional training methods without advanced technology. At the end of the program, both groups were subjected to final tests (post-test). The main results show that after 6 weeks, both groups improved their performance compared to the initial tests. However, EG achieved significantly better results than CG in every test, with significant reductions in average times (ip%) of -14.9% in RTsUL (DX = -0.072 s, t = 23.2,

Indexed as

light sensorsperformancesreaction timevolleyball players

Identifiers

PMID39311255
PMCPMC11417884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.