ReviewProteomes2024
Multi-Omic Approaches in Cancer-Related Micropeptide Identification.
Review in Proteomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary Micropeptides: Integrative In Silico Profiling and LC-MS/MS Analysis for Prostate Cancer Biomarker Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Microproteins in Metabolic Biology: Emerging Functions and Potential Roles as Nutrient-Linked Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Micropeptides in the oncological dark matter: decoding their roles in tumor progression and therapy resistance.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the advances in modern cancer therapy, malignant diseases are still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Conventional treatment methods frequently lead to side effects and drug resistance in patients, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic approaches. Recent findings have identified the existence of non-canonical micropeptides, an additional layer of the proteome complexity, also called the microproteome. These small peptides are a promising class of therapeutic agents with the potential to address the limitations of current cancer treatments. The microproteome is encoded by regions of the genome historically annotated as non-coding, and its existence has been revealed thanks to recent advances in proteomic and bioinformatic technology, which dramatically improved the understanding of proteome complexity. Micropeptides have been shown to be biologically active in several cancer types, indicating their therapeutic role. Furthermore, they are characterized by low toxicity and high target specificity, demonstrating their potential for the development of better tolerated drugs. In this review, we survey the current landscape of known micropeptides with a role in cancer progression or treatment, discuss their potential as anticancer agents, and describe the methodological challenges facing the proteome field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.