Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311176›Full record

ReviewNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2024

Social Networks as a Tool for Evidence-Based Health Education: Umbrella Review.

Teresa Sufrate-Sorzano, Olatz Corton-Carrasco, María-Elena Garrote-Cámara, Noelia Navas-Echazarreta, Pablo Del Pozo-Herce, Marco Di Nitto, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Iván Santolalla-Arnedo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Teresa Sufrate-SorzanoResearch Group in Care and Health, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3756-9914
Olatz Corton-CarrascoCruces University Hospital, Paediatric Emergency Service, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain.
María-Elena Garrote-CámaraResearch Group in Care and Health, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7504-4070
Noelia Navas-EchazarretaResearch Group in Care and Health, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
Pablo Del Pozo-HerceResearch Group in Care and Health, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-4895
Marco Di NittoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8951-622X
Raúl Juárez-VelaResearch Group in Care and Health, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-2048
Iván Santolalla-ArnedoResearch Group in Care and Health, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6705-7122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of people who access social networking sites continues to increase at an exponential rate. The use of technology is an essential skill for nursing professionals and its development represents a challenge in improving health education, promotion and care. The objective of this systematic review is to analyse the use of social networking sites by healthcare professionals as an intervention tool for evidence-based public health education.

methodsThe protocol of this umbrella review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023407249). Searches were carried out in MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, in February 2023. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted.

results1896 articles were found, of which 15 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Social networks broadened the profession; they were YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, and Instagram. The target population was mainly young professionals, and they came across different topic areas that addressed health education.

conclusionsIt is important to have information backed by scientific evidence to make health decisions. Health professionals active on social networking sites have a unique opportunity to educate the public about health by sharing scientific evidence in an accessible and clear way, which helps to combat misinformation.

Indexed as

health care professionalshealth educationnursingsocial mediasocial network

Identifiers

PMID39311176
PMCPMC11417878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.