Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311022›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.

Joshua B Rager, Matthias Kirch, Dianne C Singer, Erica Solway, Preeti N Malani, J Scott Roberts, Jeffrey T Kullgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua B RagerIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9557-5672
Matthias KirchUniversity of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dianne C SingerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Erica SolwayUniversity of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Preeti N MalaniUniversity of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Scott RobertsUniversity of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey T KullgrenUniversity of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of direct-to-consumer, at-home medical tests has grown over the last decade, but it is unknown how frequently older adults purchase at-home tests, how they perceive such tests, and how interested they are in using at-home tests in the future. We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of non-institutionalized US adults aged 50 to 80 about their previous use of, perceptions of, and future intentions to use at-home medical tests. We found that nearly half of older adults (48.1%) have purchased an at-home medical test (95% CI 45.2%-51.0%), including 32.0% (95% CI 29.3%-34.8%) who purchased a COVID-19 test, 16.6% (95% CI 14.7%-18.7%) who purchased an at-home DNA or genetic test, 5.6% (95% CI 4.5%-7.0%) who purchased a screening test for cancer, and 4.4% (95% CI 3.4%-5.6%) who purchased a test for an infection other than COVID-19. Compared with White, non-Hispanic adults, Black, non-Hispanic adults were less likely to have purchased an at-home test (35.5% vs 49.6%,

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesaging researchCOVID-19direct-to-consumer testingsurvey

Identifiers

PMID39311022
PMCPMC11421401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.