ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2024
Parent and adolescent perspectives on a novel transdisciplinary model of healthcare delivery for type 1 diabetes.
Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilizing Crowdsourcing to Incorporate the Voice of the Family When Developing a Diabetes Distress Intervention.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to obtain pre-adolescent/adolescent and parent input on a proposed transdisciplinary model for routine type 1 diabetes (T1D) healthcare in which an advanced practice nurse, dietitian, and psychologist with expertise in T1D and extensive cross-discipline training co-deliver care during quarterly T1D care visits using a family-focused approach. Methods: Participants were 17 parent-youth dyads plus one additional adolescent who responded to open-ended questions about the structure and format of the proposed transdisciplinary care model via an online, private social network. A six-member coding team developed and revised a codebook, coded question responses through iterative cycles of inductive coding, and distilled major recurring themes to obtain perspectives on the transdisciplinary care model and feedback on improving the model. Results: We identified nine themes regarding reactions to our proposed transdisciplinary care model, which fell into three broad categories: 1) General Perceptions of Transdisciplinary Care (e.g., Transdisciplinary Care may facilitate improved communication and collaboration among providers and result in more holistic care); 2) Perceptions about Transdisciplinary Care Providers (e.g., Perspectives on the inclusion of dietitians and psychologists as members of the transdisciplinary care team were mixed); and 3) Suggestions for Improving the Transdisciplinary Care Model (e.g., Ensure care is patient/family centered and holistic). Conclusions: The present findings provided important feedback to modify our transdisciplinary care model and on parent and youth preferences for T1D healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.