ArticleJDS communications2024
Measurement of cow comfort during milking on different cluster removal settings through the use of leg-mounted accelerometers.
Article in JDS communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing levels of data are routinely collected on modern dairy farms. These include multiple variables measured by milking machine sensors and software and cow-attached sensor data, used predominantly for fertility and health monitoring. Following milking efficiency principles, including milking gently, quickly, and completely, there is utility in investigating how various milking machine settings affect gentleness of milking through a proxy measurement of cow comfort during milking. The use of leg-mounted accelerometers was investigated as a noninvasive labor-efficient means of estimating cow comfort on different automatic cluster remover (ACR) milk flow-rate switch-point settings. Accelerometer step count measurements during milking were collected from 37 cows divided into 2 groups allocated to either an ACR milk flow-rate switch-point setting of 0.2 kg/min or 0.8 kg/min for a 2-wk period and then crossed over to the other setting. Significantly more rear leg stepping occurred during daily milking (combined step count during a.m. and p.m. milkings) where the ACR activated at 0.2 kg/min (11.7 steps) compared with 0.8 kg/min (10.1 steps). Shorter milking interval between a.m. and p.m. milkings resulted in lower udder fill and reduced milk flow-rate. Under these lower udder fill conditions, rear leg movement, as an indicator of cow comfort, reduced when milk flow-rate switch-point for cluster removal increased from 0.2 kg/min (5.75 steps) to 0.8 kg/min (4.96 steps). There was no significant difference between stepping rates on both cluster removal settings during a.m. milkings. Similarly, no significant differences were noted in assessed postmilking teat condition, which was conducted after a.m. milking. The 0.2 kg/min setting extended total daily milking time by 70 s, resulting in lower mean flow-rates while producing similar milk yield. Higher vacuum levels at the teat-end were also recorded on this milking setting. This provides further incentive to consider cluster removal settings above 0.2 kg/min.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.