ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2024
Intensive reprocessing of reusable bronchoscopes can reduce the false positive rate of Xpert MTB/RIF caused by nucleic acid residue.
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why a Mycobacterium Avium Infected Patient Showed a Positive Xpert MTB/RIF Result?Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Tuberculosis remains a leading cause of infectious death worldwide, The potential for nucleic acid residue on bronchoscopes to cause false positive results in molecular diagnostic methods and subsequently lead to tuberculosis misdiagnosis has long perplexed clinical. Methods: We utilized Xpert MTB/RIF to analyze the liquid collected after bronchoscope washing, employed by patients either with or without active pulmonary tuberculosis, and subjected to standard reprocessing (SR) or intensive reprocessing (IR) procedures. The IR procedure included specialized training and the provision of patient information to cleaning staff before the SR procedure, and repeated washing and suction of the bronchoscope with sterilized water post SR procedure. Results: 55 participants enrolled in the study were divided into three groups: SR group (n = 28), IR group(n = 14), and the control group(n = 13). Among the 55 enrolled patients, neither Mycobacterium tuberculosis nor contamination was detected by MIGT 960 liquid culture in the washing liquid. The positive rate of MTB/RIF in the SR group (12/28) was significantly higher than that in the IR group (1/14), with a statistically significant difference observed between them (42.86 % vs. 7.14 %, P=0.018). Conclusions: Nucleic acid residue on reusable bronchoscopes cleaned via the SR procedure was found to potentially cause false positives in MTB/RIF tests. Reprocessing bronchoscopes via the IR procedure was effective in significantly reducing nucleic acid residue, although complete elimination was not achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.