ReviewInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2024
Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI in central nervous system tumors, a narrative review.
Review in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for differentiating tumour recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated intra-axial brain tumours.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in distant metastasis staging of non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Advancements in Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals: Innovations in Diagnosis and Therapy for Enhanced Cancer Management.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- Multimodal data fusion: integrating PET/MRI and liquid biopsy for a holistic view of cancer biology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Linking Cortical Structure and Cerebrospinal Fluid Metabolites with Venous Thromboembolism Risk: A Two-Step Mendelian Randomization and Co-Localization Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPET/CT and PET/MRI are two useful imaging modalities in neuro-oncology. Our aim was to review the existing literature on the benefits and drawbacks of using PET/CT and PET/MRI in the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors.
methodsA literature search was conducted using valid databases, limited to English-language articles published between 2010 and 2023, and independently reviewed by two reviewers. A standard data extraction form was used to extract data from the included papers. The results were condensed and narratively presented, accompanied by supporting data from the included investigations.
resultsThe study analyzed 28 articles, mostly from Europe. The results varied, with some studies comparing PET/CT and PET/MRI, examining specific types of brain tumors, pediatric tumors, or focusing on specific PET/CT or PET/MRI modalities. The synthesis aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of PET/CT and PET/MRI use in CNS malignancies.
conclusionsPET/MRI offers promising advantages in neuro-oncology diagnosis and follow-up imaging, but its use should be prioritized in appropriate situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.