Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310666›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024

Prunes May Blunt Adverse Effects of Oral Contraceptives on Bone Health in Young Adult Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Taylor DeMasi, Michelle Tsang, Jenna Mueller, Kristine Giltvedt, Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, Mark Kern, Shirin Hooshmand

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04785131 (The Impact of Consuming California Dried Plums on Bone Health of Young Women Using Hormonal Contraceptives), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04785131 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Consuming California Dried Plums on Bone Health of Young Women Using Hormonal Contraceptives

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsOsteoporosis RiskArmsPrune
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Taylor DeMasiSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Michelle TsangSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Jenna MuellerSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Kristine GiltvedtSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Thuy Ngoc NguyenSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mark KernSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Shirin HooshmandSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral contraceptives (OCs) may promote bone loss, thereby leading to suboptimal bone health later in life. Research is needed to determine whether dietary interventions can blunt OC-related bone loss; prune consumption, shown to be effective in improving bone density in previous studies, could provide a safe and inexpensive solution. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether 12 mo of consuming 50 g of prunes daily would prevent bone loss or increase bone accrual in young (18-25 y) OC users. Methods: Ninety women were randomly assigned to a control group not using OCs (non-OC), an OC group not consuming prunes (OC), and an OC group consuming 50 g prunes daily (OC+P) for 12 mo. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline and after 12 mo via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (at all sites) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (at tibia). Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 mo to assess biomarkers. Results: There were no significant differences between groups for dietary intake, physical activity, serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, or bone alkaline phosphatase concentrations. Baseline serum C-reactive protein and vitamin D concentrations were higher ( Conclusions: OC use tended to promote minor negative effects on bone and consuming prunes tended to provide a potential protective effect on trabecular density of the distal tibia and ultradistal radius.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04785131.

Indexed as

bone healthdried plumsoral contraceptivesosteoporosiswomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID39310666
PMCPMC11415679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.