Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310647›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Challenges, Barriers, and Facilitators in Telemedicine Implementation in India: A Scoping Review.

Simran Arora, Ramesh K Huda, Sakshi Verma, Mukti Khetan, Ramesh K Sangwan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adoption of Telemedicine for Dementia Care in Nigeria: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simran AroraPublic Health, Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, IND.
Ramesh K HudaInformation Technology, National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jodhpur, IND.
Sakshi VermaPublic Health, Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, IND.
Mukti KhetanBiostatistics, National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jodhpur, IND.
Ramesh K SangwanEpidemiology and Public Health, National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jodhpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare access by breaking geographical barriers and facilitating remote consultations. The eSanjeevani platform has been pivotal in India, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite its benefits, implementing telemedicine faces various challenges and barriers. This scoping review aims to identify these challenges, barriers, and facilitators in the Indian context. This review follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify studies published between January 2019 and January 2024. Studies on telemedicine adoption, barriers, and facilitators in India were included. Data were extracted and synthesized from 26 quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research studies. Individual-level challenges include limited digital literacy, particularly among older adults and those in rural areas, and health literacy issues. Barriers such as limited smartphone access, unreliable internet connectivity, and socio-cultural preferences for in-person consultations were identified. Facilitators at this level include family involvement, training programs, and community outreach. Provider-level challenges involve a lack of training and concerns about care quality, while barriers include insufficient infrastructure and medico-legal concerns. Facilitators include ongoing training, clear guidelines, and user-friendly telehealth systems. System-level challenges include integrating telemedicine into existing infrastructure and ensuring data security. Barriers include inadequate funding and resistance to change, while facilitators include policy support, investment in infrastructure, and collaborative efforts. Telemedicine holds great potential to enhance remote healthcare access in India, but its successful implementation requires addressing significant challenges and barriers. Strengthening digital infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy, standardizing protocols, and developing clear regulatory frameworks are essential. Collaborative efforts and tailored approaches that respect local cultures can further facilitate telemedicine adoption. Continuous research and public awareness campaigns are necessary to ensure telemedicine's sustainable and effective use in India.

Indexed as

challenges & barriersesanjeevanifacilitatorsimplementationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39310647
PMCPMC11414145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.