ArticleCureus2024
Predictive Factors for the Healing of Rotator Cuff Repairs.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [Effect of autologous osteochondral tissue and periosteum transplantation on tendon-bone healing of rotator cuff in rabbits].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Influence of Psychological Resilience on Postoperative Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a significant cause of shoulder pain. Rotator cuff repair is common, but healing failure is frequent and the reasons for the retear are still unclear.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine if specific preoperative factors related to patients and tears affect the structural outcome after rotator cuff repair.
methodsThis is a multivariate prognostic model study, based on prospectively collected data from a retrospective cohort. We included individuals who received arthroscopic RCT repair from January 2013 to April 2022. Evaluations were performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12 months postoperatively, and clinical outcomes were measured using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scale. Statistical analysis was conducted using multivariate logistic regression.
resultsThe sample included 176 patients, with a retear rate of 35.2%. Male (p=0.029), smoking (p=0.026), full-thickness infraspinatus tears (p=0.007), and instability of the long head of the biceps (p=0.046) were identified as predictive factors for non-healing. Traumatic lesions (p=0.017) favored healing. All patients showed significant clinical improvement. At 24 months, patients with healed tendons had better clinical outcomes.
conclusionMale sex, smoking, full-thickness infraspinatus tears, and instability of the long head of the biceps are predictive factors for retear after rotator cuff repair. Traumatic lesions favor tendon healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.