ArticleCureus2024
Midwives' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Perinatal Care for Women With Disabilities.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health professionals' knowledge and understanding of inclusion health: a systematic literature review.Health policy and planning · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWomen with disabilities (WWD) face significant barriers to accessing quality perinatal care, resulting in adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns. Midwives are crucial in providing this care, but their knowledge and attitudes can impact the quality of services delivered. This study aims to examine midwives' knowledge and attitudes toward perinatal care for WWD and identify factors influencing these aspects.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2023, involving 149 midwives from various healthcare settings. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire addressing demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers related to perinatal care for WWD. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used for analysis, with a significance level set at 0.05.
resultsThe sample comprised predominantly female midwives (146, 98%), with a mean age of 33.7 years and a mean of 9.8 years of work experience. Only 48 (32.2%) reported workplaces equipped for perinatal care for WWD. Most participants rated the perinatal care services in Greece for WWD as moderate (87, 58.4%) and believed that the medical staff's knowledge in this area was insufficient (148, 99.3%). The mean knowledge score was 35 points out of 100, indicating a low level of knowledge. Key barriers included the lack of adapted services (148, 99.3%) and insufficient infrastructure (143, 96%). Despite these challenges, 142 (95.3%) midwives supported the right of WWD to have children. Significant correlations were found between higher knowledge scores and less specialized attitudes, while more perceived barriers correlated with a greater need for further education.
conclusionsThis study highlights the urgent need for improved education and training programs for midwives to enhance their knowledge and attitudes toward perinatal care for WWD. Addressing educational and structural barriers is essential to provide equitable and high-quality care. Policymakers should prioritize creating inclusive healthcare environments and support ongoing professional development for midwives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.