Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310522›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

A Narrative Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ketamine in Pediatric Sedation: A Critical Analysis of Current Evidence.

Lakshmi Naga Sai Sivani Dasari, Sanjot Ninave

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lakshmi Naga Sai Sivani DasariAnesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sanjot NinaveAnesthesia and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation in pediatric patients presents unique challenges due to their developmental and physiological differences compared to adults. Oral ketamine, a dissociative anesthetic, has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional sedatives, offering a non-invasive method for achieving sedation in children. This comprehensive review evaluates the efficacy and safety of oral ketamine for pediatric sedation, consolidating evidence from recent studies and clinical trials. The review details the pharmacological properties of oral ketamine, including its mechanism of action and its role in achieving effective sedation. It examines dosing guidelines, clinical applications, and the outcomes of sedation procedures utilizing oral ketamine. Additionally, the review addresses the safety profile of oral ketamine, including standard and serious adverse effects, and provides recommendations for monitoring and managing potential risks. Comparative analyses with other sedation methods highlight the advantages and limitations of oral ketamine, including its effectiveness and ease of administration compared to intravenous (IV) and inhaled sedatives. The review also identifies gaps in the current literature and suggests areas for future research, including long-term safety and potential developmental impacts. In conclusion, oral ketamine represents a valuable option for pediatric sedation, offering a balance of efficacy and ease of use. This review aims to guide clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the use of oral ketamine, contributing to safer and more effective sedation practices in pediatric care.

Indexed as

efficacynon-invasive sedationoral ketaminepediatric sedationsafetysedative agents

Identifiers

PMID39310522
PMCPMC11416828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.