ReviewCureus2024
A Narrative Review of Soccer-Related Concussion Management in Children and Adults Over the Past 10 Years.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soccer-related concussions (SRC) have increased despite an overall reduction of concussions across all sports activities. Few papers have studied the mechanism of injury, and have been mostly done in high-income countries or focused on small populations, preventing generalization. Our goal was to analyze the available data published about SRC over the past 10 years, independent of the country's income level. A narrative review was performed. The definition of sport-related concussion from the American Academy of Neurology and studies published between 2013 and 2023 were used. Of 1210 articles, 45 met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that SRC was more frequent in females (57.6%) than males (44.3%). Player-to-player interaction was the most common mechanism of injury, with midfielders being the most affected position. The first providers to diagnose were certified athletic trainers, within the first 24 hours. Neurological evaluations, including SCAT (Sport Assessment Concussion Tool) and ImPact (Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing), were included in 42.2% of the studies, with SCAT and ImPact specifically used in 15.5% and 11% of cases, respectively. Need for hospitalization was found in 8.9% of participants and one player required surgical intervention. At the time of the concussion, confusion, dizziness, and amnesia were reported frequently. However, after the concussion, headaches and dizziness were prevalent. Follow-up data were included in 35.5% of the studies. On average, children missed 15 practice days and returned to school after 8 days. In conclusion, future research should focus on the circumstances around head-to-head injuries by age, sex, and level of professionalism as well as the importance of early diagnosis and careful follow-up, to protect the players and improve their outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.