ArticleCureus2024
Pattern of Immune Reconstitution Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Data From a Resource Constraint Country.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the Pattern of immune reconstitution (IR) post allogeneic stem cell transplant at six months. STUDY
designProspective observational study. Place and duration of the study: This study was conducted at The Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre (AFMBTC) Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from May 2022 to December 2022. METHODOLOGY: After approval from the institutional review board, informed/written consents were taken from patients. All patients (both genders, irrespective of age) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant were included in the study. Patients undergoing haplo-identical or autologous bone marrow transplants were excluded from the study. Innate immune reconstitution was checked by complete blood count and adaptive immune reconstitution at six months was checked lymphocyte subset analysis and serum immunoglobulin levels. Data was entered in pre-designed proforma and was analyzed using IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
resultsThis study analyzes 43 patients, including 67% (n=29) males. The median age at the time of HSCT was 11.19 years. Cellular and humoral reconstitution at six months after transplant was used to assess immune reconstitution. Innate immune reconstitution was checked by complete blood count for count recovery (Neutrophil engraftment), and adaptive immune reconstitution (cellular/humoral) at six months was checked lymphocyte subset analysis and serum immunoglobulin levels. By using chi-square, significant associations were found as pre-transplant condition regimen with CD4 (PChi= 0.001), GVHD prophylaxis with CD4 (PChi= 0.04), source of stem cells with CD19 (PChi= 0.008), patient-donor gender disparity with CD19 (PChi= 0.05), GVHD treatment low CD19 (PChi= 0.04), patient-donor relationship with IgA(PChi= 0.007), IgG (PChi= 0.001), and IgM (PChi= 0.001), gender of the patient with IgA (PChi= 0.04).
conclusionOur data suggested that at post-transplant six months, there was adequate immune reconstitution except for CD4 and CD4:CD8 ratio. Therefore, post-transplant, six months in Allo-HSCT could be considered for immunization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.