ArticleCureus2024
Utility of Handheld Ultrasound in Identifying Millimeter-Sized Vasculature in Living and Cadaveric Subjects.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Manual Therapy vs. Surgery: Which Is Best for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Relief?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the utility of handheld, Bluetooth-capable ultrasound in identifying millimeter-sized vasculature in both living and cadaveric subjects. Methods Using handheld, linear ultrasound probes, the carpal tunnel of 87 living individuals (174 forearms) was assessed for the presence of a persistent median artery (PMA). Radial, ulnar, and persistent median arterial diameters were measured, along with forearm circumference. Using the same probes, 46 cadaveric forearms were assessed for the presence of a "potential" PMA. Those same forearms were subsequently dissected to confirm the presence of the artery. Results A PMA was identified in 3.4% of individuals (1.7% of forearms). Radial, ulnar, and persistent median arterial diameters were 2.12 ± 0.40 mm, 1.89 ± 0.41 mm, and 0.82 ± 0.33 mm, respectively. The radial artery was significantly larger than the ulnar artery (p < 0.0001). In cadaveric subjects, four "potential" PMAs were identified by pre-dissection ultrasound. Upon dissection, only one of the "potential" PMAs was confirmed, and three previously unidentified PMAs were identified. Conclusions The prevalence of PMA in living subjects was lower than previously reported. Additionally, handheld ultrasound had low accuracy in identifying PMAs in cadavers prior to dissection. This could be an indication that current handheld ultrasound lacks the sensitivity to identify millimeter-sized vasculature, such as a PMA. In both populations of subjects, key, non-anomalous anatomy was readily seen, indicating the utility of handheld ultrasound in the proper context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.