ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Analysis of Antimicrobial Properties and Physical Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Mixed With Distilled Water, Chlorhexidine, and Sodium Hypochlorite Solutions: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity and antimicrobial efficacy of a poloxamer 407-based pulp capping agent and mineral trioxide aggregate: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Physical Properties of Three Different Tricalcium Silicate Cements: An In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndodontics widely uses mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) because of its excellent sealing ability, biocompatibility, and capacity to promote healing. However, the effectiveness of MTA can vary depending on the blending solution used. Endodontics commonly employ chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), but their impact on MTA's properties necessitates further investigation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe blended MTA with the specified solutions and prepared it for testing according to the manufacturer's instructions. The study was divided into four groups: group 1 involved MTA blended with distilled water, group 2 consisted of MTA blended with 0.12% CHX solution (PerioGard, Colgate-Palmolive, Osasco, Brazil), group 3 included MTA blended with 0.2% CHX solution (Corsodyl, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, England, UK), and group 4 comprised MTA blended with 5% NaOCl (Azure Research Lab Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India). The antimicrobial activity of each group was assessed using the agar diffusion method against
resultsGroup 3 (MTA blended with 0.2% CHX) exhibited the highest antimicrobial efficacy, with significantly larger inhibition zones against
conclusionMTA mixed with 0.2% CHX provides superior antimicrobial properties, making it suitable for enhanced microbial control in endodontic treatments. Conversely, MTA mixed with 0.12% CHX offers optimal long-term compressive strength. These findings guide selecting MTA formulations to maximize performance based on clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.