ArticleCureus2024
Performance of ChatGPT 4.0 on Japan's National Physical Therapist Examination: A Comprehensive Analysis of Text and Visual Question Handling.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of GPT-4o With Human Performance in the Polish Vascular Surgery Specialty Examination.Cureus · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Training by Assessing GPT-4 and GPT-4o on the Japan Surgical Board Examination With Text-Only and Image-Accompanied Questions: Performance Evaluation Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- ChatGPT (GPT-4V) Performance on the Healthcare Information Technologist Examination in Japan.Cureus · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Accuracy of ChatGPT in the Japanese Board-Certified Physiatrist Examination.Cureus · 2024Article
- Evaluating the potential of ChatGPT for patient identification in clinical breast cancer trials.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChatGPT 4.0, a large-scale language model (LLM) developed by OpenAI, has demonstrated the capability to pass Japan's national medical examination and other medical assessments. However, the impact of imaging-based questions and different question types on its performance has not been thoroughly examined. This study evaluated ChatGPT 4.0's performance on Japan's national examination for physical therapists, particularly its ability to handle complex questions involving images and tables. The study also assessed the model's potential in the field of rehabilitation and its performance with Japanese language inputs.
methodsThe evaluation utilized 1,000 questions from the 54 ANALYSIS: ChatGPT's performance was evaluated based on accuracy rates using various criteria: general and practical questions were analyzed with Fisher's exact test, A-type (single correct answer) and X2-type (two correct answers) questions, text-only questions versus questions with images and tables, and different question lengths using Student's t-test.
resultsChatGPT 4.0 met the passing criteria with an overall accuracy of 73.4%. The accuracy rates for general and practical questions were 80.1% and 46.6%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the accuracy rates for A-type (74.3%) and X2-type (67.4%) questions. However, a significant difference was observed between the accuracy rates for text-only questions (80.5%) and questions with images and tables (35.4%). DISCUSSION: The results indicate that ChatGPT 4.0 satisfies the passing criteria for the national exam and demonstrates adequate knowledge and application skills. However, its performance on practical questions and those with images and tables is lower, indicating areas for improvement. The effective handling of Japanese inputs suggests its potential use in non-English-speaking regions.
conclusionChatGPT 4.0 can pass the national examination for physical therapists, particularly with text-based questions. However, improvements are needed for specialized practical questions and those involving images and tables. The model shows promise for supporting clinical rehabilitation and medical education in Japanese-speaking contexts, though further enhancements are required for a comprehensive application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.