Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310431›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Performance of ChatGPT 4.0 on Japan's National Physical Therapist Examination: A Comprehensive Analysis of Text and Visual Question Handling.

Shogo Sawamura, Kengo Kohiyama, Takahiro Takenaka, Tatsuya Sera, Tadatoshi Inoue, Takashi Nagai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shogo SawamuraDepartment of Rehabilitation, Heisei College of Health Sciences, Gifu, JPN.
Kengo KohiyamaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Heisei College of Health Sciences, Gifu, JPN.
Takahiro TakenakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Heisei College of Health Sciences, Gifu, JPN.
Tatsuya SeraDepartment of Rehabilitation, Heisei College of Health Sciences, Gifu, JPN.
Tadatoshi InoueDepartment of Rehabilitation, Heisei College of Health Sciences, Gifu, JPN.
Takashi NagaiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Heisei College of Health Sciences, Gifu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChatGPT 4.0, a large-scale language model (LLM) developed by OpenAI, has demonstrated the capability to pass Japan's national medical examination and other medical assessments. However, the impact of imaging-based questions and different question types on its performance has not been thoroughly examined. This study evaluated ChatGPT 4.0's performance on Japan's national examination for physical therapists, particularly its ability to handle complex questions involving images and tables. The study also assessed the model's potential in the field of rehabilitation and its performance with Japanese language inputs.

methodsThe evaluation utilized 1,000 questions from the 54 ANALYSIS: ChatGPT's performance was evaluated based on accuracy rates using various criteria: general and practical questions were analyzed with Fisher's exact test, A-type (single correct answer) and X2-type (two correct answers) questions, text-only questions versus questions with images and tables, and different question lengths using Student's t-test.

resultsChatGPT 4.0 met the passing criteria with an overall accuracy of 73.4%. The accuracy rates for general and practical questions were 80.1% and 46.6%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the accuracy rates for A-type (74.3%) and X2-type (67.4%) questions. However, a significant difference was observed between the accuracy rates for text-only questions (80.5%) and questions with images and tables (35.4%). DISCUSSION: The results indicate that ChatGPT 4.0 satisfies the passing criteria for the national exam and demonstrates adequate knowledge and application skills. However, its performance on practical questions and those with images and tables is lower, indicating areas for improvement. The effective handling of Japanese inputs suggests its potential use in non-English-speaking regions.

conclusionChatGPT 4.0 can pass the national examination for physical therapists, particularly with text-based questions. However, improvements are needed for specialized practical questions and those involving images and tables. The model shows promise for supporting clinical rehabilitation and medical education in Japanese-speaking contexts, though further enhancements are required for a comprehensive application.

Indexed as

chatgpt 4.0images and tableslarge-scale language modelnational physical therapist examtext-only questions

Identifiers

PMID39310431
PMCPMC11413471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.