ArticleCureus2024
Impact of Socio-Demographics and Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) on Misconceptions of Metformin Use in Diabetes: A Potential Myth and Disbelief in South Asia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe influence of misconceptions and related socio-demographics on metformin use could hamper adherence to medications. This study aimed to assess the rates and causes of metformin non-adherence and to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) on misconceptions of metformin use including the association with socio-demographic variables.
methodsAn observational analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at the diabetes clinic of Karapitiya Teaching Hospital in Galle, Sri Lanka. Causes of metformin non-adherence, associations with socio-demographics, and KAP on misconceptions on metformin use were assessed using the chi-squared test, t-tests, and ANOVA using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) (p<0.05).
resultsMetformin non-adherence was reported as 55%. Use of complementary and alternative therapies was 14.7%. Fear of major organ failure was the commonest (20.5%) reason quoted within the non-adherence group (N=223). Socio-demographic factors like ethnicity, lower education, unemployment, use of complementary and alternative therapies, and obtaining medications for other diabetes-related diseases significantly influenced adherence to the metformin-prescribed doses (p<0.05). Among all participants (N=400), the most common misconception was that long-term use of metformin caused organ damage (kidney 72.5%, liver 64.3%, and heart 34.8%), while 44% believed higher doses (two tablets or more for a day) caused organ damage. The KAP scores were reported as 24.5% with low, 52.7% moderate, and 22.7% satisfactory levels. Significantly lower KAP scores were associated with lower education levels and patients obtaining complementary and alternative therapies (p<0.05).
conclusionMisconceptions are not merely kept in mind but lead to non-adherence with metformin doses prescribed and warrant evidence-based educational interventions with the high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.