ReviewCureus2024
Epidemiological Characteristics of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Epidemiology of traumatic spinal injuries in a low-resource setting: a retrospective cohort from southwestern Iran.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Fractures at Ibra Hospital, Oman: A Retrospective Study With Regional Comparisons.Cureus · 2026Article
- Three Decades of Spinal Cord Injury in Saudi Arabia: Trends in Incidence, Prevalence, and Disability Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Global epidemiological trends and burden of cervical and subcervical spinal cord injuries, 1990-2021: a multidimensional analysis using global burden of disease data.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a severe condition with high mortality and disability rates. Understanding the regional TSCI epidemiology may facilitate the development of targeted preventive initiatives and the optimization of resource allocation. The primary goal of this systematic review was to gather and analyze the existing literature on the frequency and characteristics of TSCI in Saudi Arabia. A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted in January 2024 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Observational studies reporting TSCI epidemiology in Saudi Arabia between 2010 and 2022 were included. Data on demographics, mechanisms, levels/severity, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Nine studies involving 2,356 TSCI cases were analyzed. Most patients were young males. Road traffic accidents were shown to be the predominant cause, accounting for 56.5-90.8% of cases. Thoracic (28.7-48.3%) and cervical (26.6-39%) levels were the most common. The extent of neurological deficits showed significant variation throughout the studies. This review provides a baseline understanding of TSCI epidemiology in Saudi Arabia but highlights critical gaps that future research should address. The review emphasizes the need for evidence-based interventions targeting road safety and falls, standardized cervical spine evaluation and management, and the use of validated metrics to optimize patient outcomes. Large-scale population-based studies with standardized methodologies are necessary to fully understand TSCI epidemiology, prognosis, and long-term disability burden in Saudi Arabia, leading to better prevention strategies and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.