ReviewCureus2024
Ocular Complications of Zygomatic Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The infraorbital vein: embryology, anatomy, histology, variations, and clinical relevance.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Review
- W2 Technique for the placement of zygomatic implants and the new guidelines for optimal implant surgical approach: a technical note.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Comparison of biomechanical performance of custom implants with different designs under functional load: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Delayed-onset maxillary sinus-cutaneous fistula of the lower eyelid following zygomatic implant removal: A case report.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Clinical Risk and Medico-Legal Implications in Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expected clinical and patient-centered outcomes associated with different rehabilitation strategies for severe maxillary atrophy: an international cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Chewing efficiency and patient-centered outcomes in maxillary rehabilitation with zygomatic vs. conventional implant-supported fixed restorations.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Surgical Management of Severe Maxillary Atrophy Using Customized Subperiosteal Titanium Implants: Report of Two Clinical Cases With 42 Months of Follow-Up.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Five-Year Comparative Study of Zygomatic and Subperiosteal Implants: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Treatment Strategies for Severe Maxillary Atrophy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zygomatic implants are a form of dental implant that anchors in the zygomatic bone with potential for complications to the eye and orbit. This article presents a systematic review of the literature regarding ophthalmological complications of zygomatic implants to familiarize ophthalmologists with the potential complications and their treatment options. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Various searches using PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar were used to search for articles using search terms including 'zygomatic', 'dental', 'implant', 'complications', 'eye,' and 'orbit.' Exclusion criteria included articles that were unavailable in English or written before 1980. Twenty-four articles were included in this review: nine case reports, one case series, nine cohort studies, one randomized controlled trial, and four review articles. The most common complication was infraorbital paresthesia, followed by intraoperative orbital penetration. Other complications included implants placed into the orbit, orbital hematomas, extraocular muscle damage, diplopia, subconjunctival hemorrhage, periorbital fistulae, infraorbital rim infections, and orbital emphysema. Of 41 cases, which included outcomes, 10 patients required further procedures, and five patients had irreversible damage. It is important for both oral and maxillofacial surgeons and ophthalmologists to recognize these complications for proper coordination of care and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.