Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310386›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Ocular Complications of Zygomatic Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.

Moshe I Weber, Elliot Koschitzki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moshe I WeberOphthalmology, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, USA.
Elliot KoschitzkiDentistry, Long Island Implant and Cosmetic Dentistry, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zygomatic implants are a form of dental implant that anchors in the zygomatic bone with potential for complications to the eye and orbit. This article presents a systematic review of the literature regarding ophthalmological complications of zygomatic implants to familiarize ophthalmologists with the potential complications and their treatment options. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Various searches using PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar were used to search for articles using search terms including 'zygomatic', 'dental', 'implant', 'complications', 'eye,' and 'orbit.' Exclusion criteria included articles that were unavailable in English or written before 1980. Twenty-four articles were included in this review: nine case reports, one case series, nine cohort studies, one randomized controlled trial, and four review articles. The most common complication was infraorbital paresthesia, followed by intraoperative orbital penetration. Other complications included implants placed into the orbit, orbital hematomas, extraocular muscle damage, diplopia, subconjunctival hemorrhage, periorbital fistulae, infraorbital rim infections, and orbital emphysema. Of 41 cases, which included outcomes, 10 patients required further procedures, and five patients had irreversible damage. It is important for both oral and maxillofacial surgeons and ophthalmologists to recognize these complications for proper coordination of care and treatment.

Indexed as

complicationdental implanteyeorbitorbital penetrationzygomatic implant

Identifiers

PMID39310386
PMCPMC11416179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.