ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Preliminary discrimination and evaluation of clinical application value of ChatGPT4o in bone tumors.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-database Bibliometric Analysis Combined with Gephi-based Network Visualization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Identification and Diagnosis of Thyroid Space-occupying Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Generative artificial intelligence, large language models and ChatGPT in musculoskeletal Oncology: Current applications and future potential.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Revolutionising osseous biopsy: the impact of artificial intelligence in the era of personalized medicine.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Large language model evaluation in autoimmune disease clinical questions comparing ChatGPT 4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 1.5 pro.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
•Evaluation of making up ChatGPT4o in the preliminary pathological diagnosis of bone tumors.•ChatGPT-4o's proficiency in analyzing pathological images and providing initial diagnoses of bone tumor characteristics is comparable to that of senior pathologists in the Tertiary hospital doctors group, with both surpassing the Remote grassroots doctors group.•AI, like ChatGPT-4o, has the potential to enhance diagnostic capabilities for remote grassroots doctors and improve sensitivity to reduce missed diagnosis rates among tertiary hospital doctors in identifying bone tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.