Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310340›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2024

N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Versus Absorbable Tacks in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clayton C Petro, Benjamin K Poulose, Michael J Rosen, Alfredo M Carbonell, Adel G El-Ghazzawy, Jeremy A Warren, Emanuele Lo Menzo, Ajita S Prabhu, David M Krpata, Samuel Szomstein and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Clayton C PetroFrom the Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Benjamin K PouloseDepartment of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Michael J RosenFrom the Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Alfredo M CarbonellDepartment of Surgery, Prisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
Adel G El-GhazzawyOverlake Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Bellevue, WA.
Jeremy A WarrenDepartment of Surgery, Prisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
Emanuele Lo MenzoOverlake Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Bellevue, WA.
Ajita S PrabhuFrom the Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
David M KrpataFrom the Department of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
Samuel SzomsteinOverlake Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Bellevue, WA.
Vimal NarulaDepartment of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Crystal F TottenDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Kelly R HaisleyDepartment of Surgery, Center for Abdominal Core Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Andrew C BernardDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Henrik O BerdelDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Jessica K ReynoldsDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Zachary D WarrinerDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.
John S RothDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to determine whether n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NB2C) adhesive is a safe and effective mechanism for nonpenetrating mesh and peritoneal fixation during laparoscopic groin hernia repair. Background: Chronic pain after laparoscopic groin hernia repair has been associated with penetrating fixation, but there had been no US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for nonpenetrating fixation in this context. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) groin hernia repair with mesh at 1 of 5 academic medical centers were randomized to mesh (TAP/TEP) and peritoneal (TAP) fixation with NB2C adhesive or absorbable tacks. The primary outcome was improvement in pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) at 6 months. The noninferiority margin was 0.9 (α = 0.025; β = 80%). Recurrence, successful use of the device, quality of life, and rates of adverse events (AEs) were secondary outcomes. Results: From 2019 to 2021, 284 patients were randomized to either NB2C adhesive or absorbable tacks (n = 142/142). Patient and hernia characteristics were comparable, and 65% were repaired using a TAP approach. The difference in VAS improvement at 6 months with NB2C adhesive was not inferior to absorbable tacks in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively (0.25 [95% CI, -0.33 to 0.82]; Conclusions: NB2C adhesive is safe and effective for mesh fixation and peritoneal closure during laparoscopic groin hernia repair.

Indexed as

adhesivecyanoacrylatefixationgroin herniainguinal herniatacksTAPTEP

Identifiers

PMID39310340
PMCPMC11415099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.