Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310231›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of methodology2024

Early versus delayed necrosectomy in pancreatic necrosis: A population-based cohort study on readmission, healthcare utilization, and in-hospital mortality.

Hassam Ali, Faisal Inayat, Vinay Jahagirdar, Fouad Jaber, Arslan Afzal, Pratik Patel, Hamza Tahir, Muhammad Sajeel Anwar, Attiq Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sarfraz and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hassam AliDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States.
Faisal InayatDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Punjab 54550, Pakistan. faisalinayat@hotmail.com.
Vinay JahagirdarDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
Fouad JaberDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States.
Arslan AfzalDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27834, United States.
Pratik PatelDivision of Gastroenterology, Mather Hospital and Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University, Port Jefferson, NY 11777, United States.
Hamza TahirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jefferson Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19141, United States.
Muhammad Sajeel AnwarDepartment of Internal Medicine, UHS Wilson Medical Center, Johnson City, NY 13790, United States.
Attiq Ur RehmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711, United States.
Muhammad SarfrazDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711, United States.
Ahtshamullah ChaudhryDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Dominic's Hospital, Jackson, MS 39216, United States.
Gul NawazDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Punjab 54550, Pakistan.
Dushyant Singh DahiyaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States.
Amir H SohailDepartment of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87106, United States.
Muhammad AzizDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute necrotizing pancreatitis is a severe and life-threatening condition. It poses a considerable challenge for clinicians due to its complex nature and the high risk of complications. Several minimally invasive and open necrosectomy procedures have been developed. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, the optimal timing to perform necrosectomy lacks consensus.

aimTo evaluate the impact of necrosectomy timing on patients with pancreatic necrosis in the United States.

methodsA national retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with non-elective admissions for pancreatic necrosis were identified. The participants were divided into two groups based on the necrosectomy timing: The early group received intervention within 48 hours, whereas the delayed group underwent the procedure after 48 hours. The various intervention techniques included endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical necrosectomy. The major outcomes of interest were 30-day readmission rates, healthcare utilization, and inpatient mortality.

resultsA total of 1309 patients with pancreatic necrosis were included. After propensity score matching, 349 cases treated with early necrosectomy were matched to 375 controls who received delayed intervention. The early cohort had a 30-day readmission rate of 8.6% compared to 4.8% in the delayed cohort (

conclusionOur findings show that early necrosectomy is associated with better clinical outcomes and lower healthcare costs. Delayed intervention does not significantly alter the risk of 30-day readmission.

Indexed as

Acute necrotizing pancreatitisDelayed necrosectomyEarly necrosectomyMortalityPancreatic necrosisReadmission, Healthcare costs

Identifiers

PMID39310231
PMCPMC11230070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.