ArticleACS omega2024
An Orthogonal Workflow of Electrochemical, Computational, and Thermodynamic Methods Reveals Limitations of Using a Literature-Reported Insulin Binding Peptide in Biosensors.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Design and Biophysical Characterization of Analyte-Responsive Polymers.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing a continuous insulin-monitoring biosensor is of great importance for both the cellular biomanufacturing industry and for treating diabetes mellitus. Such a sensor needs to be able to effectively monitor insulin across a range of temperatures and pHs and with varying concentrations of competing analytes. One of the two main components of any biosensor is the recognition element, which is responsible for interacting with the molecule of interest. Prior literature describes an insulin-binding peptide (IBP) that was reported to bind to insulin with a 3 nM affinity. Here, we used orthogonal and complementary electrochemical, computational, and thermodynamic characterization methods to evaluate IBP's appropriateness for use in a biosensor. Unfortunately, all three methods failed to produce evidence of IBP-insulin binding either on surfaces or in solution. This indicates that the binding exhibited in previous reports is likely restricted to a limited set of conditions and that IBP is not a suitable recognition element for a continuous insulin biosensor.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.