ArticleACS omega2024
Optimizing Aromaticity for Graphitization.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing graphite demand for energy storage confronts a significant hurdle: a dwindling supply of high-quality precursors. This study introduces a simple additive upgradation strategy, exploring the potential of waste plastics and lower-quality aliphatic pitches to improve scant high-aromaticity pitch precursors by providing donatable hydrogen. The results indicate not only that high-quality aromatic pitches can accommodate waste plastics and lower-quality aliphatic pitches but also that their synergistic composition leads to improved graphitic quality and a uniform crystalline phase in the heat-treated products. Optimal aromaticity values have been investigated through a graphitization study of diverse pitch samples. Additionally, the effectiveness of quinoline insoluble removal as a subtractive strategy on crystallite sizes after graphitization was investigated, and remarkable improvements were observed in the crystallite sizes of the graphitized product.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.