Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310170›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Chameleon Sequences-Structural Effects in Proteins Characterized by Hydrophobicity Disorder.

Irena Roterman, Mateusz Slupina, Katarzyna Stapor, Leszek Konieczny, Krzysztof Gądek, Piotr Nowakowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irena RotermanDepartment of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University-Medical College, Medyczna 7, 30-688 Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-9099
Mateusz SlupinaALSTOM ZWUS Sp. z o.o., Modelarska 12, 40-142 Katowice, Poland.
Katarzyna StaporFaculty of Automatic, Electronics and Computer Science, Department of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Leszek KoniecznyChair of Medical Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University-Medical College, Kopernika 7, 31-034 Krakow, Poland.
Krzysztof GądekAGH Cyfronet, SANO SCIENCE, Nawojki 11, 30-950 Kraków, Poland.
Piotr NowakowskiAGH Cyfronet, SANO SCIENCE, Nawojki 11, 30-950 Kraków, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated protein folding processes both in vivo and in vitro leading to the same structure for a specific amino acid sequence prove that the amino acid sequence determines protein structuring. This is also evidenced by the variability of structuring, dependent on the introduced mutations. An important phenomenon in this regard is the presence of a differentiated secondary structure for chain fragments of identical sequence representing distinct forms of the secondary-order structure. Proteins termed chameleon proteins contain polypeptide chain fragments of identical sequence (length 6-12 aa) showing structural differentiation: helix versus β-structure. In the present paper, it was shown that these fragments represent components matching the structural status dictated by the physicochemical properties of the entire structural unit. This structural matching is related to achieving the goal of the biological function of the structural unit. The corresponding secondary structure represents a means to achieving this goal, not an end in itself. A selected set of proteins from the ChSeq database have been analyzed using a fuzzy oil drop model (FOD-M) identifying the uniqueness of the hydrophobicity distribution taken as a medium for recording the specificity of a given protein and a given chameleon section in particular. It was shown that in the vast majority, the status of chameleon sections turns out to be comparable regardless of the represented secondary structure.

Identifiers

PMID39310170
PMCPMC11411663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.