Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310143›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

VOC-Certifire: Certifiably Robust One-Shot Spectroscopic Classification via Randomized Smoothing.

Mohamed Sy, Emad Al Ibrahim, Aamir Farooq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed SyPhysical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-5321
Emad Al IbrahimPhysical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8595-5102
Aamir FarooqPhysical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-2197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectroscopic methods are advantageous for gas detection with applications ranging from safety to operational efficiency. Despite the potential of laser-based sensors, real-world challenges, such as noise, interference and unseen conditions, hinder the accurate identification of species. The use of conventional machine learning (ML) models is constrained by extensive data requirements and their limited adaptability to new conditions. Although augmentation-based strategies have proven to improve the robustness of machine learning models, they still do not offer a complete defense. To address these challenges, this study focuses on three primary goals: first, to detect pressure-induced spectral broadening using simple yet effective augmentations; second, to bypass the need for extensive data sets by deploying a one-shot learning approach that can identify up to 12 volatile organic compounds (VOCs); and third, to provide a provable certification for the one-shot learning model predictions via randomized smoothing. To assess the effectiveness of our proposed augmentations and randomized smoothing, we perform a comparative study with four distinct models: VOC-net, VOC-lite, VOC-plus, and VOC-certifire. Remarkably, the one-shot learning model proposed herein, VOC-certifire, delivers predictions that match the baseline model VOC-net. The VOC-certifire predictions not only exhibit robustness and reliability but are also certified within a predefined norm radius. Such a certification is particularly useful for gas detection, where the robustness, precision and consistency are key to well-informed decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID39310143
PMCPMC11411668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.