ArticleACS omega2024
Comparative Analysis of Silk Fibroin Membranes across Cross-Linking Methods: Processing and Characterization.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photobonding of silk fibroin-based hydrogels to rabbit corneas.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silk fibroin (SF) extracted from silkworm silk can be transformed into transparent membranes with well-suited physical properties for ophthalmic applications. There is ample literature on the fabrication and characterization of SF-based membranes; however, the use of diverse SF extraction protocols and characterization methods or their settings makes it difficult to compare different silk membrane properties across studies. In this work, we fabricated 10 families of SF-based membranes by physical cross-linking and one non-cross-linked as a control. We evaluated transparency (ranging from 84.5 to 95.3% in the visible spectrum), enzyme stability (from 24 h to 200 days in protease XIV), decomposition temperature (280-290 °C), water uptake (40-60%), Young's modulus (8-30 MPa), roughness (1.6-22.7 nm), and FTIR spectra for the secondary structure. We found correlation between water uptake and the Young's modulus (the lower the water uptake, the higher the Young's modulus) and a relationship between membrane stability in protease XIV and the secondary structure of the proteins. Higher surface roughness and faster degradation were found in membranes cross-linked with polyethylene glycol, and conversely, lower roughness and lower degradation were found in methanol, ethanol, or isopropanol crossed-link membranes. This ample compilation of materials and their characterization will aid in the selection of a SF-based material according to the needs of the application.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.