ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Safety and Efficacy of Mitomycin C: Augmented Trabeculectomy: Subtenon's Injection versus Sponge Application.
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sponge Application of Mitomycin C vs Sub-Tenon Injection in Trabeculectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to study the safety and efficacy of subtenon injection of mitomycin C (MMC) versus sponge application of MMC during trabeculectomy. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven patients having primary glaucoma warranting trabeculectomy were enrolled in the study and their forty eyes were alternately allocated into either of the two groups: subtenon injection (ST) of 0.1 mL of 0.01% of MMC or sponge application (SP) of 0.02% of MMC and were operated by a single surgeon and followed for 3 months. The outcome was analyzed primarily based on reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) and bleb morphology. Results: Similar outcome in terms of complete success (ST - 90% and SP - 85%), qualified success (ST - 5% and SP - 5%), and failure rate (ST - 5% and SP - 10%) was seen at the end of 3 months. The absolute reduction in IOP from the baseline was -10.00 ± 3.67 mmHg (-41.2% ± 12.30) in ST versus -8.90 ± 5.56 mmHg (-35.9% ± 16.1) in the SP group at the end of 3 months. At the end of 3 months, blebs in the ST group had low-to-medium height and in the SP group had low height. Blebs in both the groups were diffuse with mild vascularity. Antiglaucoma medications required postoperatively were 0.20 ± 0.62 versus 0.40 ± 1.10 in the ST and SP group, respectively. The duration of surgery was 19.85 ± 0.75 min in the ST group versus 22.50 ± 0.51 min in the SP group. Conclusion: Subtenon injection of MMC is as efficacious and safe as the conventional sponge application technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.