ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Investigation of the Optimal Age in Months for Initiation of Conservative Treatment for Congenital Auricular Deformities.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of conservative treatment for congenital auricular deformities depends primarily on the plasticity of the auricular cartilage. However, the effect remains uncertain due to various confounding factors such as differences in the characteristics of the deformity and timing of treatment initiation. In this study, we investigated the optimal timing for initiation of conservative treatment. Methods: We investigated the age at treatment initiation and surgical avoidance rate among 158 children with congenital auricular deformities who were treated with corrective devices at our hospital. In addition, we conducted and analyzed questionnaires containing items assessing treatment satisfaction and characteristics. Results: Surgical avoidance rates decreased markedly among those starting treatment after 5 months of age, and satisfaction was significantly higher in the surgical avoidance group. Multivariate analysis showed that the only factor affecting the treatment effect was the age at treatment initiation. Conclusions: This study suggests that the initiation of conservative treatment with corrective devices within 5 months of age for congenital auricular deformities may lead to avoidance of surgery and increased satisfaction. However, we should not judge the indication for conservative treatment solely based on age in months. Bearing in mind the effectiveness of initiating treatment within the first 5 months of age, we should initiate treatment at the earliest appropriate age with consideration of the individual patient's type and severity of deformity and cartilage elasticity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.