Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310032›Full record

Article3 Biotech2024

Physio-morphological and molecular characterization of ethyl methanesulfonate-derived mutant population of

Sushma, Umesh Kumar, Vipin Kumar Tiwari, Priyamvada Mishra, Vaishali, Hemant Kumar Yadav, Samir V Sawant, Pramod Arvind Shirke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

SushmaCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
Umesh Kumar *Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
Vipin Kumar TiwariCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
Priyamvada MishraCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
VaishaliCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
Hemant Kumar YadavCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
Samir V SawantCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.
Pramod Arvind ShirkeCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow, 226001 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1077-3344

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the response of ethyl methanesulfonate-derived twenty mutant lines of Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-024-04089-1.

Indexed as

DroughtEMSGossypium herbaceumPhotosynthesisWagadWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39310032
PMCPMC11415324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.