Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39310024›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2024

Clinical evaluation of the convolutional neural network‑based automatic delineation tool in determining the clinical target volume and organs at risk in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

Yangyang Huang, Rui Song, Tingting Qin, Menglin Yang, Zongwen Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yangyang HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.
Rui SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.
Tingting QinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.
Menglin YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.
Zongwen LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450014, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delineating the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) is crucial in rectal cancer radiotherapy. However, the accuracy of manual delineation (MD) is variable and the process is time consuming. Automatic delineation (AD) may be a solution to produce quicker and more accurate contours. In the present study, a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based AD tool was clinically evaluated to analyze its accuracy and efficiency in rectal cancer. CT images were collected from 148 supine patients in whom tumor stage and type of surgery were not differentiated. The rectal cancer contours consisted of CTV and OARs, where the OARs included the bladder, left and right femoral head, left and right kidney, spinal cord and bowel bag. The MD contours reviewed and modified together by a senior radiation oncologist committee were set as the reference values. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient (JAC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to evaluate the AD accuracy. The correlation between CT slice number and AD accuracy was analyzed, and the AD accuracy for different contour numbers was compared. The time recorded in the present study included the MD time, AD time for different CT slice and contour numbers and the editing time for AD contours. The Pearson correlation coefficient, paired-sample t-test and unpaired-sample t-test were used for statistical analyses. The results of the present study indicated that the DSC, JAC and HD for CTV using AD were 0.80±0.06, 0.67±0.08 and 6.96±2.45 mm, respectively. Among the OARs, the highest DSC and JAC using AD were found for the right and left kidney, with 0.91±0.06 and 0.93±0.04, and 0.84±0.09 and 0.88±0.07, respectively, and HD was lowest for the spinal cord with 2.26±0.82 mm. The lowest accuracy was found for the bowel bag. The more CT slice numbers, the higher the accuracy of the spinal cord analysis. However, the contour number had no effect on AD accuracy. To obtain qualified contours, the AD time plus editing time was 662.97±195.57 sec, while the MD time was 3294.29±824.70 sec. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that AD can significantly improve efficiency and a higher number of CT slices and contours can reduce AD efficiency. The AD tool provides acceptable CTV and OARs for rectal cancer and improves efficiency for delineation.

Indexed as

automatic delineationclinical evaluationclinical target volumeconvolutional neural network-basedorgans at riskrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39310024
PMCPMC11413726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.