ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
Exploring the determinants of self-directed learning among medical undergraduates: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing self-directed learning readiness among Indian medical graduates: Implications for educators and policymakers.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Medical Council has recognized the importance of self-directed learning (SDL) for medical graduates and it has been included as one of the competencies for Indian Medical Graduates. The present study was conducted to explore different determinants, and the factors facilitating and deterring of SDL among medical undergraduates. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted with 40 phase 2 MBBS students and data were collected through focused group discussions over a period of four weeks. A content analysis approach was used in the analysis.
resultsThe participants included 23 women (58%) and 17 men (42%). The study revealed three main themes and six sub-themes as factors deterring SDL. The majority of participants (84%) favored individual learning, while a smaller number preferred team-based learning. DISCUSSION: Cognitive factors emerged as the most common barriers, including problems with initiation and engagement in SDL and the enormous amount of data available. Educational environmental factors, such as heavy workloads and time constraints, as well as frequent assessments, were also identified as barriers. Attitudinal and mental barriers encompassed issues like lack of practical experience, difficulties in adapting to new learning environments, and challenges in concentration and focus.
conclusionOverall, this study fills gaps in our understanding of factors deterring students' engagement in SDL and provides valuable insights for educators and institutions in implementing effective SDL activities. By addressing these barriers, medical education can equip students better to become lifelong learners and meet the evolving demands of the medical profession.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.