ArticleHeliyon2024
Multi-label deep learning for comprehensive optic nerve head segmentation through data of fundus images.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lights and Shadows on Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma: Transforming Screening, Monitoring, and Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Ophthalmic Imaging Technology for Glaucoma Diagnosis from 2015 to 2024.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis and continuous monitoring of patients with eye diseases are critical in computer-aided detection (CAD) techniques. Semantic segmentation, a key component in computer vision, enables pixel-level classification and provides detailed information about objects within images. In this study, we present three U-Net models designed for multi-class semantic segmentation, leveraging the U-Net architecture with transfer learning. To generate ground truth for the HRF dataset, we combine two U-Net models, namely MSU-Net and BU-Net, to predict probability maps for the optic disc and cup regions. Binary masks are then derived from these probability maps to extract the optic disc and cup regions from retinal images. The dataset used in this study includes pre-existing blood vessels and manually annotated peripapillary atrophy zones (alpha and beta) provided by expert ophthalmologists. This comprehensive dataset, integrating existing blood vessels and expert-marked peripapillary atrophy zones, fulfills the study's objectives. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated by training nine pre-trained models on the HRF dataset comprising 45 retinal images, successfully segmenting the optic disc, cup, blood vessels, and peripapillary atrophy zones (alpha and beta). The results demonstrate 87.7 % pixel accuracy, 87 % Intersection over Union (IoU), 86.9 % F1 Score, 85 % mean IoU (mIoU), and 15 % model loss, significantly contributing to the early diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma and optic nerve disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.