Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309943›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Analyzing trends: A bibliometric study of administrative law and forensic accounting in the digital age.

Abdallah Kalaf Al-Raggad, Mishael Al-Raggad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdallah Kalaf Al-RaggadGerman Jordanian University, Jordan.
Mishael Al-RaggadJadara University, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research conducts an extensive bibliometric analysis to explore trends and patterns in administrative law and forensic accounting within the digital era. Utilizing the Web of Science database, we employ VOSviewer software for bibliometric analysis, incorporating statistical techniques such as cluster analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and bibliographic coupling of countries to scrutinize 543 publications from 2010 to 2024. Our findings reveal a growing interest and relevance in administrative law and forensic accounting, reflecting the complexities stemming from technological advancements, regulatory changes, and financial misconduct in the digital age. Identifying influential contributors, emerging topics, and interdisciplinary connections underscores the interconnectedness of these fields, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts to tackle multifaceted challenges in the digital landscape. Recommendations for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers include embracing advanced technologies, updating regulatory frameworks, and fostering interdisciplinary research. Future research directions suggest expanding data sources, conducting longitudinal studies, and integrating qualitative analyses to provide a richer understanding of practical implications and challenges. This study provides a valuable foundation for enhancing regulatory compliance, financial transparency, and ethical conduct in the digital economy, promoting innovation and consumer protection in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Indexed as

Administrative lawDigital ageFinancial Integrity and bibliometric analysisForensic accountingRegulatory compliance

Identifiers

PMID39309943
PMCPMC11415712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.