ReviewHeliyon2024
Analyzing trends: A bibliometric study of administrative law and forensic accounting in the digital age.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research conducts an extensive bibliometric analysis to explore trends and patterns in administrative law and forensic accounting within the digital era. Utilizing the Web of Science database, we employ VOSviewer software for bibliometric analysis, incorporating statistical techniques such as cluster analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and bibliographic coupling of countries to scrutinize 543 publications from 2010 to 2024. Our findings reveal a growing interest and relevance in administrative law and forensic accounting, reflecting the complexities stemming from technological advancements, regulatory changes, and financial misconduct in the digital age. Identifying influential contributors, emerging topics, and interdisciplinary connections underscores the interconnectedness of these fields, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts to tackle multifaceted challenges in the digital landscape. Recommendations for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers include embracing advanced technologies, updating regulatory frameworks, and fostering interdisciplinary research. Future research directions suggest expanding data sources, conducting longitudinal studies, and integrating qualitative analyses to provide a richer understanding of practical implications and challenges. This study provides a valuable foundation for enhancing regulatory compliance, financial transparency, and ethical conduct in the digital economy, promoting innovation and consumer protection in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.