ArticleHeliyon2024
Prognostic value of Glasgow Prognostic Score and its modified scores on 5-year outcome in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Hepatic Recompensation in Decompensated Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- The role of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in predicting postoperative mortality following open-heart surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparative Prognostic Accuracy of Clinical and Inflammation- or Nutrition-Based Scores in Older Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and its modified counterparts, including the modified GPS (mGPS) and hsCRP-modified GPS (hs-mGPS), are widely used inflammatory indices in clinical settings. Inflammation has gained increased attention in the context of coronary heart disease (CHD); however, its long-term predictive value in patients with CHD remains uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to assess the predictive values of GPS, mGPS, and hs-mGPS for long-term survival in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Consecutive 10,724 PCI patients were enrolled in 2013. The primary endpoint was 5-year all-cause death. Results: This study included 8,909 patients. Individuals with high GPS, mGPS, and hs-mGPS scores exhibited a significantly higher risk of all-cause death compared to those with low scores (all P < 0.05). All three indices (GPS, mGPS, and hs-mGPS) demonstrated predictive values for all-cause death, albeit with relatively low area under the curve values of 0.534, 0.522, and 0.545, respectively. Furthermore, we refined the hs-mGPS using cutoffs (hsCRP at 2 mg/L and albumin at 40 g/L) which are better suited for these patients, to establish the CHD-hs-mGPS. This modification significantly improved the prediction of all-cause death, outperformed the mGPS and demonstrated numerical superiority over both the GPS and hs-mGPS. Notably, only CHD-hs-mGPS exhibited a predictive value for both the ACS and non-ACS subgroups. Conclusion: In patients with CHD who underwent PCI, GPS, mGPS, and hs-mGPS demonstrated significant long-term predictive values for all-cause death. Our parameter-adjusted score, the CHD-hs-mGPS, is applicable to a broad population and moderately enhances the predictive accuracy, facilitating the early identification of patients at high risk of long-term death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.