ArticleHeliyon2024
Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: A meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence and predictors of acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Risk Factors for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Sepsis Caused by Peptic Ulcer Perforation: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Age-related vulnerability and clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: a stratified cohort study of 1,034 patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Risk factors, predictive biomarkers, and microbial profile of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort Study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure in the ICU.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles as emerging platforms for modulating innate immune responses in sepsis-associated acute lung injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Early ARDS in Children with Sepsis in the PICU: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- My approach to respiratory sepsis: pulmonary.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Detection of drug-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome risk signals in FAERS: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a critical complication of sepsis, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identifying risk factors for ARDS among sepsis patients is essential for early intervention and improving outcomes. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis, reviewing studies that examined the association between various risk factors and ARDS development in sepsis patients. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched up to January 2024, without language restrictions. Eligible studies included observational cohorts and case-control studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed through I Results: 15 studies with more than 40,000 participants were analyzed. Significant risk factors for ARDS included pulmonary infection (OR: 2.696, 95 % CI: 1.655 to 4.390), septic shock (OR: 2.627, 95 % CI: 1.850 to 3.731), and pancreatitis (OR: 3.734, 95 % CI: 2.958 to 4.712). No significant associations were found between the development of ARDS in septic patients and the following risk factors: sex (OR: 1.106, 95%CI: 0.957-1.279), smoking status (OR: 1.214, 95%CI: 0.835-1.765), or steroid use (OR: 0.901, 95%CI: 0.617-1.314). APACHE-II and SOFA scores were predictive of ARDS development, emphasizing their utility in clinical assessments. Conclusion: Pulmonary infection, septic shock, and pancreatitis significantly increase ARDS risk in sepsis patients. Our findings advocate for targeted management of these risk factors to mitigate ARDS development, emphasizing the importance of personalized care in sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.