Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309898›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

The promises and challenges of AI-based chatbots in language education through the lens of learner emotions.

Yuehai Xiao, Tianyu Zhang, Jingyi He

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuehai XiaoDepartment of English, Hunan Normal University, Changsha City, China.
Tianyu ZhangDepartment of English, Hunan Normal University, Changsha City, China.
Jingyi HeDepartment of English, Hunan Normal University, Changsha City, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of AI-based chatbots in language education has garnered significant attention, yet the interplay between chatbots and positive psychology remains underexplored. Filling this gap through a critical analysis of existing theories, measurement scales, and empirical evidence, this paper evaluates the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating AI chatbots in language learning environments and how AI chatbots may positively or negatively impact emotional dimensions of language acquisition. The findings unravel that the primary advantages of the AI chatbots are personalized instruction with rapid feedback, a decrease in anxiety levels and a surge in motivation, greater learner independence and self-directed learning, and the fostering of metacognitive abilities. Conversely, the identified obstacles encompass restricted emotional awareness, a deficiency in genuine human interaction, ethical dilemmas and privacy issues, as well as the potential reinforcement of biases and stereotypes. By highlighting the importance of learner emotions in the language learning process, this conceptual analysis review underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of how AI chatbots can support or hinder emotional engagement and motivation. The paper discusses the impacting factors of AI-based chatbots in language education, and strategies for addressing challenges and optimizing chatbot-learner interactions, such as incorporating affective computing techniques and designing culturally-sensitive chatbots. Finally, the article outlines future research directions, emphasizing the need for validated emotion scales in chatbot assisted language learning contexts, longitudinal studies, mixed-methods research, comparative analyses, and investigations into the role of chatbots in fostering emotional intelligence and intercultural competence.

Indexed as

AI-based chatbotsChatbot-learner interactionsLanguage educationLearner emotionsPositive psychology

Identifiers

PMID39309898
PMCPMC11416278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.