ArticleHeliyon2024
Improving performance in colorectal cancer histology decomposition using deep and ensemble machine learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Constructing a Prognostic Model for Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer Based on Machine Learning and Immune Infiltration-Related Genes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Diagnosis of colorectal cancer using residual transformer with mixed attention and explainable AI.PloS one · 2025Article
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit Model Combined with TransNet for Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis Under Imbalanced Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prognostic and predictive value of pathohistological features in gastric cancer and identification of SLITRK4 as a potential biomarker for gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning predicts upper secondary education dropout as early as the end of primary school.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Explainable Machine Learning Models for Colorectal Cancer Prediction Using Clinical Laboratory Data.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In routine colorectal cancer management, histologic samples stained with hematoxylin and eosin are commonly used. Nonetheless, their potential for defining objective biomarkers for patient stratification and treatment selection is still being explored. The current gold standard relies on expensive and time-consuming genetic tests. However, recent research highlights the potential of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to facilitate the extraction of clinically relevant biomarkers from these readily available images. These CNN-based biomarkers can predict patient outcomes comparably to golden standards, with the added advantages of speed, automation, and minimal cost. The predictive potential of CNN-based biomarkers fundamentally relies on the ability of CNNs to accurately classify diverse tissue types from whole slide microscope images. Consequently, enhancing the accuracy of tissue class decomposition is critical to amplifying the prognostic potential of imaging-based biomarkers. This study introduces a hybrid deep transfer learning and ensemble machine learning model that improves upon previous approaches, including a transformer and neural architecture search baseline for this task. We employed a pairing of the EfficientNetV2 architecture with a random forest classification head. Our model achieved 96.74% accuracy (95% CI: 96.3%-97.1%) on the external test set and 99.89% on the internal test set. Recognizing the potential of these models in the task, we have made them publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.