ArticleHeliyon2024
Computational imaging for rapid detection of grade-I cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD).
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- White matter hyperintensities and the risk of vascular dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2025Pooled it
- A hybrid model for improved nail disease classification using vision transformers and stable diffusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Serum cystatin C levels are independently correlated with cognitive impairment in individuals with cerebral small vessel disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Review
- Improving lung cancer detection with enhanced convolutional sequential networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Community-acquired pneumonia identification from electronic health records in the absence of a gold standard: A Bayesian latent class analysis.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Potential of AI-based diagnostic grading system for knee osteoarthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An early identification and subsequent management of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) grade 1 can delay progression into grades II and III. Machine learning algorithms have shown considerable promise in medical image interpretation automation. An experimental cross-sectional study aimed to develop an automated computer-aided diagnostic system based on AI (artificial intelligence) tools to detect grade 1-cSVD with improved accuracy. Patients with Fazekas grade 1 cSVD on Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain of age >40 years of both genders were included. The dataset was pre-processed to be fed into a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) model. A 3D stack with the shape (120, 128, 128, 1) containing axial slices from the brain magnetic resonance image was created. The model was created from scratch and contained four convolutional and three fully connected (FC) layers. The dataset was preprocessed by making a 3D stack, and normalizing, resizing, and completing the stack was performed. A 3D-CNN model architecture was designed to train and test preprocessed images. We achieved an accuracy of 93.12 % when 2D axial slices were used. When the 2D slices of a patient were stacked to form a 3D image, an accuracy of 85.71 % was achieved on the test set. Overall, the 3D-CNN model performed very well on the test set. The earliest and the most accurate diagnosis from computational imaging methods can help reduce the huge burden of cSVD and its associated morbidity in the form of vascular dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.