ArticleHeliyon2024
Interactions of memantine and rivastigmine with graphene oxide nanocarrier and beta-amyloid protein using molecular docking and in-silico methods.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of molecular docking in nanomedicine.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is characterized by the accumulation of beta-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Effective therapeutic strategies involve inhibiting the formation of beta-amyloid aggregates and destabilizing existing ones. A significant challenge in current treatments is the inability of therapeutic agents to cross the blood-brain barrier, a limitation addressed by employing drug nanocarriers. This study investigates the interactions between memantine, rivastigmine, beta-amyloid structures, and graphene oxide nanocarriers using molecular docking and in silico methods. The goal is to enhance drug development through cost-effective and efficient computational techniques. Results indicate that the binding energies for memantine-beta-amyloid and rivastigmine-beta-amyloid complexes are -9.03 kcal/mol and -7.81 kcal/mol, respectively, suggesting superior stability for the memantine-beta-amyloid complex. The electrostatic energies are -1.91 kcal/mol for memantine and -0.81 kcal/mol for rivastigmine, further supporting the greater stability of the memantine complex. Additionally, memantine's interaction with graphene oxide results in more negative adsorption energy (-92.47 kJ/mol) compared to rivastigmine (-86.36 kJ/mol), indicating a stronger binding affinity. The charge transfer (Q) values are -0.41 kJ/mol for memantine and -0.33 kJ/mol for rivastigmine. The negative enthalpy (ΔH) of -85.71 kJ/mol and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of -41.52 kJ/mol for the memantine-graphene oxide interaction suggest a spontaneous process. Both memantine and rivastigmine display similar electronic properties, but memantine shows a more effective interaction with graphene oxide, likely due to its amine functional group and spatial configuration. The adsorption energy analysis confirms that memantine forms a more stable complex with graphene oxide than rivastigmine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.