Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Multiview deep learning networks based on automated breast volume scanner images for identifying breast cancer in BI-RADS 4.

Yini Li, Cao Li, Tao Yang, Lingzhi Chen, Mingquan Huang, Lu Yang, Shuxian Zhou, Huaqing Liu, Jizhu Xia, Shijie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yini Li *Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Cao Li *Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Tao YangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Lingzhi ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Mingquan HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Lu YangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Shuxian ZhouArtificial Intelligence Innovation Center, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Guangdong, China.
Huaqing LiuArtificial Intelligence Innovation Center, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Guangdong, China.
Jizhu XiaDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.
Shijie WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) based automatic segmentation and classification system to classify benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions imaged with ABVS. Methods: From May to December 2020, patients with BI-RADS 4 lesions from Centre 1 and Centre 2 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training set (Centre 1) and an independent test set (Centre 2). All included patients underwent an ABVS examination within one week before the biopsy. A two-stage DL framework consisting of an automatic segmentation module and an automatic classification module was developed. The preprocessed ABVS images were input into the segmentation module for BI-RADS 4 lesion segmentation. The classification model was constructed to extract features and output the probability of malignancy. The diagnostic performances among different ABVS views (axial, sagittal, coronal, and multi-view) and DL architectures (Inception-v3, ResNet 50, and MobileNet) were compared. Results: A total of 251 BI-RADS 4 lesions from 216 patients were included (178 in the training set and 73 in the independent test set). The average Dice coefficient, precision, and recall of the segmentation module in the test set were 0.817 ± 0.142, 0.903 ± 0.183, and 0.886 ± 0.187, respectively. The DL model based on multiview ABVS images and Inception-v3 achieved the best performance, with an AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.945-0.953), 82.14%, 95.56%, 92.00%, and 89.58%, respectively, in the test set. Conclusions: The developed multiview DL model enables automatic segmentation and classification of BI-RADS 4 lesions in ABVS images.

Indexed as

automated breast ultrasoundBI-RADS 4breast cancerdeep learningsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39309734
PMCPMC11412795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.