Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309726›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Effectiveness of remotely delivered speech therapy in persons with Parkinson's disease - a randomised controlled trial.

Janna J L Maas, Nienke M de Vries, Joanna IntHout, Bastiaan R Bloem, Johanna G Kalf

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03963388 (The PERSPECTIVE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03963388 nacompletednot on this map

The PERSPECTIVE Study: PERsonalized SPEeCh Therapy for actIVE Conversation

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled214ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsSpeech therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janna J L MaasRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nienke M de VriesRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Joanna IntHoutRadboud University Medical Center, IQ Health; Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Bastiaan R BloemRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Johanna G KalfRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence supports the merits of speech therapy in Parkinson's disease, but the current practice of multiple in-house treatments is demanding for patients. We therefore assessed the effectiveness of remotely delivered and personalised speech therapy on improving quality of life and speech quality in persons with Parkinson's disease. Methods: We performed a single blinded randomised controlled trial (the PERSPECTIVE study), comparing 8 weeks of personalised remote speech therapy to no intervention (waiting list design). Patients with reduced speech intelligibility were included, regardless of disease stage or dysarthria severity. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to the intervention or control group. Measurements took place at baseline and after 8 weeks (both groups), and after 32 weeks (intervention group only). Patients were treated remotely by 20 experienced speech therapists. The primary outcome was disease-related quality of life at 8 weeks, assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). Data were analysed using analysis of covariance based on the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03963388. Findings: Between March 1, 2019, and March 27, 2021, 214 patients were enrolled in the intervention group (n = 109) or control group (n = 105). At the primary timepoint, the adjusted mean difference in PDQ-39 was -2.0 in favour of the intervention group (95% CI -4.0 to 0.1); p = 0.056). The intervention group scored better on the communication index score of the PDQ-39 (post hoc analysis), with an adjusted mean difference of -5.3 (95% CI -9.4 to -1.2; p = 0.011). We found no between-group differences on any other PDQ-39 domain. Follow-up measurements showed a significant reduction of the PDQ-39 compared to the primary timepoint with a difference of 2.40 (95% CI 0.77-4.02; p = 0.004). Interpretation: Personalised remote speech therapy improved communication-related quality of life, but not overall quality of life. Funding: Michael J. Fox Foundation, Gatsby Foundation, and Health∼Holland.

Indexed as

Parkinson's diseaseRandomised clinical trialSpeech therapyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39309726
PMCPMC11415969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.