Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309722›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Effectiveness and implementation of decentralized, community- and primary care-based strategies in promoting hepatitis B testing uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thanh Van Kim, Trang Ngoc Doan Pham, Paul Phan, Minh Huu Nhat Le, Quan Le, Phuong Thi Nguyen, Ha Thi Nguyen, Dan Xuan Nguyen, Binh Trang, Chelsea Cao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. [APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis B infection: a 2026 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Time for a globally unified chronic HBV terminology?JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thanh Van KimCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Trang Ngoc Doan PhamCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paul PhanCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Minh Huu Nhat LeCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Quan LeCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Phuong Thi NguyenUniversity of Health Sciences, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNUHCM-UHS), Binh Duong, Viet Nam.
Ha Thi NguyenUniversity of Health Sciences, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNUHCM-UHS), Binh Duong, Viet Nam.
Dan Xuan NguyenCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Binh TrangCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chelsea CaoCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ahmet GurakarDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Christopher J HoffmannCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Doan Y DaoCenter of Excellence for Liver Disease in Viet Nam, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Expanding chronic hepatitis B (CHB) testing through effective implementation strategies in primary- and community-care setting is crucial for elimination. Our study aimed to determine the effectiveness of all available strategies in the literature and evaluate their specifications and implementation outcomes, thereby informing future programming and policymaking. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023455781), searching Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and CINAHL databases up to June 05, 2024, for randomized controlled trials investigating primary- and community-care-based implementation strategies to promote CHB testing. Studies were screened against a priori eligibility criteria, and their data were extracted using a standardized protocol if included. ROB-2 was used to assess the risk of bias. Implementation strategies' components were characterized using the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework. Random-effect models were applied to pool the effectiveness estimate by strategy. Mixed-effect meta-regression was employed to investigate if effectiveness varied by the number of strategy's BCW components. Findings: 7146 unique records were identified. 25 studies were eligible for the review, contributing 130,598 participants. 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No studies were conducted in low-and-middle-income countries. Implementation outcomes were reported in only ten studies (40%). Community-based strategies included lay health workers-led education (Pooled Risk Difference = 27.9% [95% Confidence Interval = 3.4-52.4], I Interpretation: HCPs-led education stands out, and more enriched multicomponent strategies had better effectiveness. Future implementation strategies should consider critical contextual factors and policies to achieve a sustainable impact towards hepatitis B elimination targets. Funding: Tran Dolch Post-Doctoral Fellowship in Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA.

Indexed as

DecentralizationEffectivenessEliminationHepatitis BImplementationPrimary careTesting

Identifiers

PMID39309722
PMCPMC11416547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.