Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309663›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

AI-Enhanced Prediction of Aortic Stenosis Progression: Insights From the PROGRESSA Study.

Melissa Sanabria, Lionel Tastet, Simon Pelletier, Mickael Leclercq, Louis Ohl, Lara Hermann, Pierre-Alexandre Mattei, Frederic Precioso, Nancy Coté, Philippe Pibarot and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melissa SanabriaCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Lionel TastetInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Simon PelletierCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Mickael LeclercqCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Louis OhlCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Lara HermannCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Pierre-Alexandre MatteiUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, CNRS, I3S, Maasai, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Frederic PreciosoUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, CNRS, I3S, Maasai, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Nancy CotéInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Philippe PibarotInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Arnaud DroitCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a progressive chronic disease with progression rates that vary in patients and therefore difficult to predict. Objectives: The aim of this study was to predict the progression of AS using comprehensive and longitudinal patient data. Methods: Machine and deep learning algorithms were trained on a data set of 303 patients enrolled in the PROGRESSA (Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis) study who underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up on an annual basis. Performance of the models was measured to predict disease progression over long (next 5 years) and short (next 2 years) terms and was compared to a standard clinical model with usually used features in clinical settings based on logistic regression. Results: For each annual follow-up visit including baseline, we trained various supervised learning algorithms in predicting disease progression at 2- and 5-year terms. At both terms, LightGBM consistently outperformed other models with the highest average area under curves across patient visits (0.85 at 2 years, 0.83 at 5 years). Recurrent neural network-based models (Gated Recurrent Unit and Long Short-Term Memory) and XGBoost also demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, while the clinical model showed the lowest performance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates how an artificial intelligence-guided approach in clinical routine could help enhance risk stratification of AS. It presents models based on multisource comprehensive data to predict disease progression and clinical outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate AS at baseline.

Indexed as

aortic stenosisdeep learningmachine learningrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID39309663
PMCPMC11416525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.