Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309590›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India

Are conversation and whispered voice hearing tests comparable to pure tone audiometry for assessment of hearing loss? A retrospective analysis.

Anubhav Singh, Kamal Deep Joshi, Indrajeet Chauhan, Manoj Kumar Kanzhuly, Vishal Gaurav, Abha Kumari, Suraj Thapa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anubhav SinghGraded Specialist (ENT), Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, Haryana, India.
Kamal Deep JoshiClassified Specialist (ENT) & Head Neck Oncosurgeon, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, Haryana, India.
Indrajeet ChauhanGraded Specialist (ENT), Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt, India.
Manoj Kumar KanzhulySenior Advisor (ENT), Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt, India.
Vishal GauravClassified Specialist (ENT) & Neurootologist, Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, Haryana, India.
Abha KumariClassified Specialist (ENT) & Neurootologist, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, India.
Suraj ThapaClassified Specialist & Head (ENT), Command Hospital (Western Command), Chandimandir, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pure tone audiometry (PTA) is considered the standard method of hearing assessment. However, technical and logistical challenges preclude its usage for hearing screening at primary healthcare facilities. Free field hearing (FFH) tests such as conversation voice (CV) and whispered voice (WV) tests have been used for hearing assessment. However, their correlation to PTA and accuracy in detection of hearing loss are doubtful. This study aims to determine if FFH tests can be used for estimation of hearing thresholds. Methods: A retrospective analytical study was conducted at the otorhinolaryngology department. Spearman's correlation coefficient ( Results: The audiometric records of 437 persons (874 ears) were analysed. The CV and WV tests were found to have a high correlation ( Conclusion: FFH tests such as WV test can be used to estimate the hearing thresholds and screen for hearing loss when audiometric tests are not logistically feasible, such as at primary-level healthcare facilities, remote locations, and in schools. However, such tests should not be regarded as a substitute to PTA.

Indexed as

Hearing lossHearing testsPure tone audiometrySpeech discrimination tests

Identifiers

PMID39309590
PMCPMC11411336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.