Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309584›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India

Image analysis in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: A road less traveled.

Naman Surya, Poonam Raj, Kamalpreet Singh, Rakesh Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Eyes of ENT.Medical journal, Armed Forces India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naman SuryaGraded Specialist (ENT), 167 Military Hospital Pathankot, Punjab, India.
Poonam RajProfessor & Head, Department of ENT, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Kamalpreet SinghAssociate Professor, Department of ENT, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Rakesh DattaBrig AFMS (OPP & Digital Health), O/o DGAFMS, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a common condition affecting patients reporting to an otolaryngologist. However, the diagnosis of this condition is usually hinged on the combination of largely non-specific symptoms, and clinical findings on laryngoscopy. This study aimed at evaluating the utility of digital image analysis to quantitatively evaluate the severity of signs as recorded with laryngoscopy in patients of LPRD. Methods: The study group included individuals who were aged between 18 and 65 years and reported to the ENT OPD. These were then divided into two groups depending on symptoms and laryngoscopic findings. The LPRD group had symptomatic patients with an Reflux finding score (RFS) score >7. Those with an RFS of <6 were designated as the 'Normal group'. The Laryngoscopic images were recorded and analyzed using Image J software as per the set protocol. The Red Green Blue (RGB) values of the laryngoscopic images of each group were obtained and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: 200 participants were enrolled in the study with 100 participants in the LPRD group (mean age = 46.2, 40 males, 60 females) and 100 in the control group (mean age = 43.6, 55 males, 45 females). The measured RGB values were more in the LPRD group as compared to the control group and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: By providing an objective value to the degree of inflammation, RGB value measurement provides a quick, economical, adaptable tool for auxiliary and corroborative information for the diagnosis of LPRD.

Indexed as

DiagnosisImage analysisLaryngopharyngeal reflux diseaseRed green blue

Identifiers

PMID39309584
PMCPMC11411335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.