ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
A randomized control study on post-operative iris distortion following small-pupil cataract surgery using B-HEX pupil expander versus Malyugin ring.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate postoperative pupil distortion following small pupil cataract surgeries performed using B-HEX and Malyugin rings (MR). Methods: A randomized control trial was conducted from June 2020 to June 2023 at a tertiary eye-care hospital. The study consisted of 64 participants for cataract surgery with small pupil. There were two groups, one undergoing surgery with the use of B-HEX pupil expander and other with MR intraoperatively and the rest of the surgery was proceeded as per the convention. Areas of preoperative and postoperative images was calculated, put into an online software and pupil distortion was calculated in percentage. Two-tailed t-test was used to see the difference between the two groups. Results: Mean age at presentation was 70.5 ± 10.12 years. Most common cause for small pupil was tamsulosin therapy. Mean size of small-pupil was 3.0 ± 1.1 mm. With the application of two rings, mean pupillary area preoperatively was 4178.23 ± 1589.46 and postoperatively was 6100.44 ± 2658.28 following the use of MR, respectively and 30,002.93 ± 13,193.40 preoperatively and 37,648.26 ± 15,207.01 postoperatively following the use of B-Hex ring respectively. Comparing baseline area from pupillary area at 1-month follow-up, a significant increase was noted for both the rings. Also, MR caused significantly more pupillary distortion compared to B-HEX ring ( Conclusion: MR causes significantly more pupillary distortion in the postoperative period compared to B-HEX ring. Though, both the rings cause pupillary distortion, these devices expand the surgical area adequately, ease the procedure, decrease risk of complications achieving good functional visual outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.